The term **GALOIS** is used to refer to concepts found in the work of
Evariste Galois or inspired by it: see his
*Oeuvres mathématiques*. Most of the references are associated
with one piece, the “Mémoire sur les conditions de résolubilité des équations
par radicaux” (written in 1830 but first published in 1846 and comprising pp.
417ff. of the *Ouevres*. See also the
entry GROUP.

The term **GALOIS CONNECTION** is due to Oystein Ore, "Galois
Connexions," *Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.* 55 (1944), 493-513:

The object of this paper is to discuss a general type of correspondence between structures which I have called Galois connexions. These correspondences occur in a great variety of mathematical theories and in several instances in the theory of relations. ... The name is taken from the ordinary Galois theory of equations where the correspondence between subgroups and subfields represents a special correspondence of this type.

The citation above was taken from a post by William C. Waterhouse. In another post, Phill Schultz writes:

The abstract notion of Galois Connection appears in Garrett Birkhoff, "Lattice Theory,"Amer. Math. Soc. Coll. Pub.,Vol 25, 1940. I believe this is the first such occurrence, since in later editions, Birkhoff refers to other publications, but they are all later than 1940. The attribution 'Galois Connection' is simply because classical Galois Theory, as developed by Artin in the 1930’s, establishes a correspondence between subfields of an algebraic number field and subgroups of the group of automorphisms of that field which is a dual lattice isomorphism between the lattice of normal subfields and the lattice of normal subgroups. Birkhoff’s idea is to replace the set of subfields and the set of subgroups by arbitrary posets. The normal subfields and subgroups correspond to lattices of 'closed' elements of the posets. The Galois Connection is then an order reversing correspondence between the posets which is a lattice dual isomorphism between the posets of 'closed' elements.

**GALOIS FIELD.** See FIELD.

**GALOIS GROUP.** *Galois' group* is found in J. De Perott,
"A construction of Galois' group of 660 elements," *Chicago Congr.
Papers* (1897).

*Galois group* is found in 1893 in
*Lectures on Mathematics: Delivered from Aug. 28 to Sept. 9, 1893, Before Members of the Congress
of Mathematics* by Felix Klein.

*Galois group* is found in L. E. Dickson, "The *Galois*
group of a reciprocal quartic equation," *Amer. Math. Monthly*
15.

**GALOIS THEORY.** *Théorie de Galois* appears as a section heading in Camille Jordan’s
in Traité des substitutions et des équations algébriques
(1870). Here the term refers to higher degree congruences [Margherita Barile].

*Galois equation theory* appears in
Heinrich Weber, "Die allgemeinen Grundlagen der Galois’schen
Gleichungstheorie," *Mathematische Annalen,* 43 (1893)
[James A. Landau].

*Galois theory* is found in English in 1893 in the *Bulletin
of the New York Mathematical Society.*

**GAMBLER’S RUIN** is the title of J. L. Coolidge’s 1909 article in
*Annals of Mathematics*, **10**, 181-192. (David (2001)). However,
the problem of finding the probability that when two men are gambling together
the one will ruin the other goes back to Pascal. It appears as the fifth problem
at the end of Huygens’s *De Ratiociniis in Ludo Aleae* (1657) or, in English,
*The Value of All Chances ...* (1714).
The problem was treated by all the early writers in probability. See Hald (1990).

**GAME THEORY.** See THEORY OF GAMES.

**GAMMA DISTRIBUTION.** Although this distribution already had an important place in statistical
theory in the early 20^{th} century, the practice of calling it after
the GAMMA FUNCTION
on which it is based on became established in the journal literature in the
1930s and then in textbooks in the 1940s: see e.g. C. E. Weatherburn *A First
Course in Mathematical Statistics* (1946)). Previously it was usually known
by its designation in the Pearson family of curves, as a Type III distribution.

See also BETA DISTRIBUTION and PEARSON CURVES.

**GAMMA FUNCTION.** See BETA and GAMMA FUNCTIONS.

The term **GASKET** was coined by Benoit Mandelbrot. On page 131,
[Chapter 14] of "The Fractal Geometry of Nature", Benoit Mandelbrot
says:

And on page 142, Mandelbrot adds:Sierpinski gasketis the term I propose to denote the shape in Plate 141.

I call Sierpinski’s curve aThe citation above was provided by Julio González Cabillón.gasket,because of an alternative construction that relies upon cutting out 'tremas', a method used extensively in Chapter 8 and 31 to 35.

The word **GAUGE** (in gauge theory) was introduced as the German
word *maßstab* by H. Weyl (1885-1955) in 1918 in
*Sitzungsber. d. Preuss. Akad. d. Wissensch.* 30 May 475 (OED2).

**GAUSS** and **GAUSSIAN** recall the work of
Carl
Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855). Gauss contributed to many branches of mathematics
and there are eponymous terms in the theory of numbers, differential geometry,
the theory of errors and numerical analysis.

The word *Gaussian* was used (although not in a mathematical
sense) in a letter of Jan. 17, 1839, from William Whewell to Quételet: "Airy
has just put up his Gaussian apparatus..at Greenwich, including a Bifilar."

Many non-eponymous terms have Gauss connections, see e.g. the entries MODULUS, FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA, MANTISSA, METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES, COMPLEX NUMBER, POTENTIAL, and THEOREMA EGREGIUM. Gauss is also present on the Symbol pages, including Earliest Uses of Symbols of Number Theory and Earliest Uses of Symbols in Probability and Statistics.

**GAUSS’S THEOREM.** See DIVERGENCE THEOREM or GAUSS’S THEOREM.

**GAUSS-JORDAN METHOD.** In *Matrix Analysis and Applied
Linear Algebra* (2000), Carl D. Meyer writes, “Although there
has been some confusion as to which Jordan should receive credit for this
algorithm, it now seems clear that the method was in fact introduced by a
geodesist named Wilhelm Jordan
(1842-1899) and not by the more well known mathematician Marie Ennemond Camille
Jordan (1838-1922), whose name is often mistakenly associated with the technique,
but who is otherwise correctly credited with other important topics in matrix
analysis, the JORDAN CANONICAL FORM being the most notable.”
Having identified the right Jordan is not the end of the problem, for A. S.
Householder writes, in *The Theory of Matrices
in Numerical Analysis* (1964, p. 141), “The Gauss-Jordan method,
so-called seems to have been described first by Clasen (1888) [J. B. Clasen
*Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles*, (2), **12**, 251-81.] .. Since it can be regarded as
a modification of Gaussian elimination, the name of Gauss is properly applied,
but that of Jordan seems to be
due to an error, since the method was described only in the third edition of
his *Handbuch der Vermessungskunde*,
prepared after his death.” These claims were examined by S. C. Althoen
& R. McLaughlin (1987) “Gauss-Jordan Reduction: A Brief History,”
*American Mathematical Monthly*, **94**, 130-142. They conclude that Householder
was correct about Clasen and his 1888 publication but mistaken about Jordan who
was very much alive when the
third edition
of his book appeared in 1888. They
add that the “germ of the idea” was already present in the second edition of
1877. [This entry was contributed by John Aldrich.]

The name **GAUSS-MARKOV THEOREM** for the chief result
on least squares and best linear unbiassed estimation in the linear (regression)
model has a curious history. David (1998) refers to H. Scheffé’s 1959 book *Analysis
of Variance* for the first use of the phrase "Gauss-Markoff theorem"
although a JSTOR search finds a few earlier occurrences including one from 1951
by E. L. Lehmann (*Annals of Mathematical Statistics*, **22**, No. 4,
p. 587). For some years previously the term "Markoff theorem" had
been in use. It was popularised by J. Neyman who believed that this Russian
contribution had been overlooked in the West — see his "On the Two Different
Aspects of the Representative Method" (*Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society,* **97**, (1934), 558-625). The theorem is in chapter 7
of Markov’s book probability theory, translated into German as
*Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung*
(1912). However R. L. Plackett (*Biometrika,* **36**, (1949), 458-460)
pointed out that Markov had done no more than Gauss nearly a century before
in his *Theoria
combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae* (*Theory of
the combination of observations least subject to error*) (1821/3). (In the
nineteenth century the theorem was often referred to as "Gauss’s second
proof of the method of least squares" — the "first" being a Bayesian
argument Gauss published in 1809 based on the normal distribution). Following
Plackett, a few authors adopted the expression "Gauss theorem" but
"Markov" was well-entrenched and the compromise "Gauss-Markov
theorem" has become standard.

This entry was contributed by John Aldrich. See also EPONYMY, ERROR, ESTIMATION, GAUSSIAN, METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES and REGRESSION.

**GAUSS-SEIDEL METHOD.**
The Gauss-Seidel method is certainly a misnomer, which is perhaps due to
the influential textbook by Whittaker and Robinson.

According to Forsythe in 1953, the “cyclic single step process” was proposed by Nekrasov in 1885 and a block version of it by Mehmke in 1892.

In contrast to this, the methods of Gauss (1823) and Seidel (1874) proceed in a noncyclic manner, which treats the “worst component” first.

Gauss’s criterion from which to pick the next unknown is the same as in
Southwell’s relaxation method, this is why Zurmühl in his 1950
textbook
coined the term *Gauss-Southwell method* for it.

A. S. Householder wrote, “Forsythe has remarked that the Gauss-Seidel method was not known to Gauss and not recommended by Seidel.”

This entry was contributed by Jan Peter Schäfermeyer. See GAUSSIAN ELIMINATION.

The term **GAUSSIAN** applied to curve, law, distribution,
etc. in probability and statistics commemorates Gauss’s derivation of the normal
curve from the principle of the arithmetic mean and his use of it in his first
theory of least squares (1809). The derivation was new but not the distribution
for Gauss knew it had been studied by De Moivre and Laplace. Gauss had only
a passing interest in 'his' distribution for his second theory of least squares,
which produced the Gauss-Markov theorem, avoided any use of it. However, in
the 19^{th} and early 20^{th} centuries the first (normal-based)
theory was more widely taught. See ARITHMETIC
MEAN, GAUSS-MARKOV THEOREM, METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES.

The English word "Gaussian"
was apparently first used in this context by Karl Pearson who was no enthusiast
either for the name *or* for use of the distribution as a law of error:
he did not think the curve should be named after Gauss, nor did he think that
errors of measurement follow the curve.

Pearson used the phrase *Gaussian curve of errors* in a 1902 paper
("On the
Mathematical Theory of Errors of Judgment, with
Special Reference to the Personal Equation," *Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A,* **198**, pp. 235-299)
where he argued that errors of measurement are not normally distributed. [James
A. Landau]

OED2 indicates that
Pearson used the phrases *Gaussian distribution* and *Gaussian law*
in 1905 in "Das Fehlergesetz und Seine Verallgemeinerungen Durch Fechner
und Pearson." A Rejoinder, *Biometrika*, **4**, pp. 169-212: "Many
of the other remedies which have been proposed to supplement what I venture
to call the universally recognised inadequacy of the Gaussian law .. cannot
.. effectively describe the chief deviations from the Gaussian distribution."
(p. 189)

Pearson was replying to criticism in a German publication and "In writing for Germans I naturally spoke of the Gaussian curve." The use of "Gaussian" in textbooks is investigated in "Stigler’s Law of Eponymy" (reprinted in S. M. Stigler (1999)). Stigler’s earliest find is a German textbook from 1872.

Pearson (1905, p. 189n)
also argued that Laplace had priority over Gauss in discovering the curve. However
he thought that "On the whole my custom of terming the curve the Gauss-Laplacian
or *normal* curve saves us from proportioning the merit of discovery between
the two great astronomer mathematicians."

"Normal" (q.v.)
was the dominant term in English language Statistics throughout the 20^{th}
century but "Gaussian" did quite well in Probability: e.g. "la
loi de Gauss" in Paul Lévy *Calcul des Probabilités* (1925), "die
Gaußsche Verteilung" in Richard von Mises *Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung*
(1931) and "Gaussian distribution" in Norbert Wiener "The Homogeneous
Chaos," *American Journal of Mathematics*, **60**, (1938), pp.
897-936.

In an essay in the 1971
book *Reconsidering Marijuana,* Carl Sagan, using the pseudonym "Mr.
X," wrote, "I can remember one occasion, taking a shower with my wife
while high, in which I had an idea on the origins and invalidities of racism
in terms of gaussian distribution curves. I wrote the curves in soap on the
shower wall, and went to write the idea down."

This entry was contributed by John Aldrich. See EPONYMY, ERROR and NORMAL and also SYMBOLS ASSOCIATED WITH THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION on the Symbols in Probability and Statistics page.

**GAUSSIAN CURVATURE** refers to a concept that Gauss introduced in his
*General
Investigations of Curved Surfaces* (*Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas* 1827)
*Werke*
Bd 4 217ff.

The first appearance in *JSTOR* (which covers the American
journals that began publication in the late19^{th} century) is in an article
from 1900, which refers to “Gaussian curvature, as generalized by Kronecker”
in a publication of 1869.

The term *Gaussisches Krümmungsmass,* i.e. Gaussian curvature, appears in
1869 in a paper by Lipschitz
and a paper by
Kronecker.

[Jan Peter Schäfermeyer contributed to this entry.]

The name **GAUSSIAN ELIMINATION** is a tribute to the scheme
presented in section 13 of C. F. Gauss’s Disquisitio de Elementis Ellipticis
Palladis ex Oppositionibus Annorum 1803, 1804, 1807, 1808, 1809 (1811) in
*Werke vol 6*.
(See Application
of the Method of Least Squares to the Elements of the Planet Pallas.) Gauss
was describing a scheme for least squares calculations.

Gauss himself used the term *eliminatio vulgaris* in 1809 in
*Theoria motus corporum coelestium in sectionibus conicis solem ambientium,*
page 214.

The first one to have named the elimination method Gaussian was probably Bessel in an 1838 report on a surveying campaign in Eastern Prussia.

A complete account of how ordinary elimination became Gaussian elimination was given by Joseph Grcar.

See METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES, GAUSS-JORDAN METHOD and PIVOT. See also the discussion of regression notation on the Earliest Uses of Symbols in Probability and Statistics page.

[Jan Peter Schäfermeyer contributed to this entry.]

**GAUSSIAN INTEGER.** G.H. Hardy and E.M. Wright refer to the "complex or ‘Gaussian’
integers," explaining, "The Gaussian integers were used first by Gauss
in his researches on biquadratic reciprocity. See, in particular, his memoirs
entitled "Theoria residuorum biquadraticorum,"
*Werke II* 67-148.
(*An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers*, 1938.)

**GAUSSIAN LOGARITHM** appears in 1870 in *The portable transit instrument
in the vertical of the pole star,* a translation by Cleveland Abbe of
a memoir of William Döllen:
"These auxiliary angles have, for the computations of the present day---thanks to the increasing
dissemination of the Gaussian logarithms---lost, to a great
extent, their former importance; they afford a real relief
in the computation generally, only when we have to do, not
with a single case but with many connected together, in
which certain quantities are common, as, for example, often
in the computation of tables" [University of Michigan Digital Library].

The term **GENERAL INTEGRAL** is due to Lagrange (Kline, page 532).

**GENERAL SOLUTION** is found in 1820 in *A Collection of Examples of
the Applications of the Differential and Integral Calculus*
by George Peacock:
"Lagrange has denominated the equation (3), the *complete solution*
of the differential equation, to distinguish it from the *general solution,*
which involves an arbitrary function; under this form alone the
theory exemplified in p. 479, by which the *particular solutions* are
deduced from the complete integrals, admits of application in the case of partial
differential equations." [Google print search]

**GENERAL TERM** is found in 1791 in "A new method of
investigating the sums of infinite series," by Rev. Samuel Vince,
*Philos. Trans. R. Soc.*: "To find the sum of the infinite
series whose general term is ..."

**GENERALIZED FUNCTION.** See DISTRIBUTION.

**GENERALIZED INVERSE.** In 1955 Roger
Penrose published a paper describing "a generalization of the inverse of a
non-singular matrix, as the unique solution of a certain set of equations." His
paper "A Generalized Inverse for Matrices," *Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc*.,
**51**, (1955), 406-413 provoked a comment from R. Rado, "Note on Generalized Inverses
of Matrices" *Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc*., **52**, (1956), 600-1. Rado pointed
out that the same operation "defined in a slightly different form, but easily
shown to lead to the same matrix" had been introduced by
E.
H. Moore in 1920 and "systematically investigated" in 1935. The references
are to "On the Reciprocal of the General Algebraic Matrix," *Bulletin of the
American Mathematical Society*, **26**, (1920) 394-5 and *General Analysis, vol 1*. Rado expressed
the opinion, "It may possibly be the case that Moore’s work on matrices is not
as widely known as it deserves on account of the highly individual system of
logical symbols he employs."

See MATRIX.

**GENERALIZED LINEAR MODEL.** The term and the associated theory
appear in J. A. Nelder
& R. W. M. Wedderburn "Generalized Linear Models," *Journal of the Royal
Statistical Society, A*, **135**, (1972), 370-384. "We develop a
class of *generalized linear models*, which includes all the above examples
[conventional linear models, probit, contingency tables, etc.], and we give
a unified procedure for fitting them based on likelihood." p. 370. In
1975 the Royal Statistical Society’s Working Party on Statistical Computing
announced the "Generalised Linear Interactive Modelling" package,
GLIM.

See also LINK FUNCTION and DEVIANCE

**GENETIC DEFINITION** was used by Christian Wolff (1679-1754) in
*Philosophia rat. sive logica* (1728, 3rd ed. 1740) [Bernd Buldt].

*Genetic definition* was also used by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804).

*Genetic definition* was used in English in 1837-38 by the
Scottish philosopher and logician William Hamilton (1788-1856) in
*Logic* xxiv. (1866) II. 13: "In Genetic Definitions the defined
subject is considered as in the progress to be, as becoming; the
notion, therefore, has to be made, and is the result of the
definition, which is consequently synthetic" (OED2).

The term **GENETIC METHOD** (as opposed to "axiomatic method") was
apparently introduced by David Hilbert (1862-1943), and its first use
may be its appearance in the 1900 essay "Ueber den Zahlbegriff."

The term appears in English in Edward V. Huntington, "Complete Sets
of Postulates for the Theory of Real Quantities," *Transactions of
the American Mathematical Society,* July, 1903. Huntington
popularized the use of the term.

*Genetic method* was used earlier in a different sense by
Professor fuer hoehere Analysis und darstellende Geometrie Carl
Reuschle (1847-1909), son of the German mathematician Carl Gustav
Reuschle (1812-1875), in an article entitled "Constituententheorie,
eine neue, principielle und genetische Methode zur
Invariantentheorie" (1897) [Julio González Cabillón].

**GENTZEN’S HAUPTSATZ.**
See HAUPTSATZ.

**GENUS** (referring to the number of holes in a surface). This term
is due to A. Clebsch and is found in "Über die Anwendung der Abelschen Funktionen in der Geometrie,"
*Journal für Mathematik,* **63,** 189-243. This information is taken from
a footnote in the paper "Development of the concept of homotopy," by Ria Vanden Eynde
(in *History of topology,* pages 65-102. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1999).
[Dave Richeson]

The term **GEODESIC** was introduced in 1850 by Liouville and was
taken from geodesy (Kline, page 886).

The term *geodesic curvature* is due to Pierre Ossian Bonnet
(1819-1892), according to the University of St. Andrews website.

However, according to Jesper Lützen in *The geometrization of
analytical mechanics: a pioneering contribution by Joseph Liouville
(ca. 1850),* "Liouville defined the 'geodesic curvature' (the name
is due to him)...."

**GEOID** was first used in German (*geoide*) in 1872 by
Johann Benedict Listing (1808-1882) in *Ueber unsere jetzige
Kenntniss der Gestalt u. Grösze der Erde* (OED2).

**GEOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION** appears in W. Feller’s *Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications
volume 1* (1950). (David (2001)) While the name is relatively new, the concept goes back to the earliest days of probability.
Hald (1990, p. 56) argues that one of the arguments Fermat put to Pascal (in
1654) is based on the geometric distribution. See PROBABILITY.

**GEOMETRIC MEAN.** The geometric mean is one of the three Pythagorean means. See MEAN.

The term geometrical mean is found in
E. Halley "A Most Compendious and Facile Method for Constructing the Logarithms,
Exemplified and Demonstrated from the Nature of Numbers, without any Regard
to the Hyperbola, with a Speedy Method for Finding the Number from the Logarithm
Given," *Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society of London*, Vol. 19. (1695 - 1697), pp.
58-67. (JSTOR)

See also MEAN and LOGNORMAL.

The term **GEOMETRIC PROGRESSION** was used by Michael Stifel in
1543: "Divisio in Arethmeticis progressionibus respondet
extractionibus radicum in progressionibus Geometricis" [James A.
Landau].

*Geometrical progression* appears in English in 1557 in the
*Whetstone of Witte* by Robert Recorde: "You can haue no
progression Geometricalle, but it must be made either of square
nombers, or els of like flattes" (OED2).

*Geometric progression* appears in English in 1706 in *Syn.
Palmar. Matheseos* by William Jones: "The Curve describ'd by their
Intersection is called the Logarithmic Line... A Point from the
Extremity thereof, moving towards the Centre with a Velocity
decreasing in a Geometric Progression, will generate a Curve called
the Logarithmic Spiral" (OED2).

**GEOMETRIC PROPORTION.** In 1551 Robert Recorde wrote in
*Pathway to Knowledge*: "Lycurgus .. is most praised for that he
didde chaunge the state of their common wealthe frome the proportion
Arithmeticall to a proportion geometricall" (OED2).

*Geometrical proportion* appears in 1605 in Bacon, *Adv.
Learn.*: "Is there not a true coincidence between commutative and
distributive justice, and arithmetical and geometrical proportion?"
(OED2).

*Geometrical proportion* appears in 1656 in tr. *Hobbes’s
Elem. Philos.*: "If four Magnitudes be in Geometrical Proportion,
they will also be Proportionals by Permutation, (that is, by
transposing the Middle Terms)" (OED2).

*Geometric proportion* appears in 1706 in *Synopsis
Palmariorum matheseos* by William Jones: "In any Geometric
Proportion, when the Antecedent is less than the Consequent, the
Terms may be express'd by *a* and *ar* (OED2).

**GEOMETRIC SERIES** is found in 1723 in *A System of the Mathematics* James Hodgson [Google print search, James A. Landau].

The term **GEOMETRY** was in use in the time of Plato and Aristotle, and “doubtless goes back at
least to Thales,” according to Smith (vol. 2, page 273). The Greek word
γεωμετρα was formed from
γ *earth* and
μετρα *measuring*;
transliteration produced the Latin *ge**metria* which became
*géométrie* in French and thence *geometry* in English.

Smith also writes (vol. 2, page 273) that "Plato, Xenophon, and Herodotus use the word in some of its forms, but always to indicate surveying."

However, Michael N. Fried points out that Smith may not be entirely correct:

In theEpinomis(whose Platonic provenance is not completely clear), it is true that Plato refers to mensuration or surveying as 'gewmetria' (990d), but elsewhere Plato is very careful to distinguish between practical sciences concerning sensibles, such as surveying, and theoretical sciences, such as geometry. For instance, in thePhilebus(of undisputed Platonic provenance), one has:

"SOCRATES: Then as between the calculating and measurement employed in building or commerce and the geometry and calculation practiced in philosophy-- well, should we say there is one sort of each, or should we recognize two sorts?

PROTARCHUS: On the strength of what has been said I should give my vote for there being two" (57a).This distinction reoccurs in Proclus' neo-platonic commentary on Euclid’s

Elements.There Proclus writes: "But others, like Geminus... think of one part [of mathematics] as concerned with intelligibles only and of another as working with perceptibles and in contact with them... Of the mathematics that deals with intelligibles they posit arithmetic and geometry as the two primary and most authentic parts, while the mathematics that attends to sensibles contains six sciences: mechanics, astronomy, optics, geodesy, canonics, and calculation. Tactics they do not think it proper to call a part of mathematics, as others do, though they admit that it sometimes uses calculation... and sometimes geodesy, as in the division and measurement of encampments" (Friedlein, p.38).Even Herodotus does not identify geometry and geodesy, but only claims that the origin of the former might have had it origin in the later (

the Histories,II.109).

Smith (vol. 2, page 273) writes, "Euclid did not call his treatise
a geometry, probably because the term still related to land measure,
but spoke of it merely as the *Elements.* Indeed, he
did not employ the word 'geometry' at all, although it was in
common use among Greek writers. When *Euclid* was translated into
Latin in the 12th century, the Greek title was changed to the Latin
form *Elementa,* but the word 'geometry' is often
found in the title-page, first page, or last page of the early
printed editions" (Smith vol. 2, page 273).

*Geometry* appears in English in 14th century manuscripts. An
anonymous 14th century manuscript begins, "Nowe sues here a Tretis of
Geometri wherby you may knowe the heghte, depnes, and the brede of
mostwhat erthely thynges" (Smith vol. I, page 237). The OED shows
another 14th century use.

The term **GEOMETRY OF NUMBERS** was coined by Hermann Minkowski
(1864-1909) to describe the mathematics of packings and coverings.
The term appears in the title of his *Geometrie der Zahlen.*

**GIBBS PHENOMENON, GIBBS-WILBRAHAM CONSTANT etc.** In 1898 the experimental physicist
A. A. Michelson wrote to
*Nature,* **58**, (1898), 544-5 criticising the textbook
account of representing discontinuous functions by Fourier series. Among the
responses were two from
J. W. Gibbs
“Fourier Series,” *Nature*, **59**, (1898), 200 & (1899), 606. which
explained the phenomena of undershoot and overshoot. M.
Bôcher developed the theme and introduced the term “Gibbs’s
phenomenon” in his “Introduction to the
Theory of Fourier’s Series,” *Annals of Mathematics*, **7,** (1906),
81-152.

The Gibbs phenomenon had been discussed fifty years earlier by H. Wilbraham “On a certain periodic function,”
*Cambridge and Dublin Mathematical Journal*, **3**, (1848), 198–201. Henry
Wilbraham (1825–1883) published a number of mathematical papers and then made a career in
the law. His contribution was first noted in 1914 by Burkhardt in his survey of the history of
trigonometric series before 1850 in the
Encyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften 2,
T.1, H.2 819-1354 (see p. 1049). (Based
on E. Hewitt & R. E. Hewitt “The
Gibbs-Wilbraham phenomenon: An
episode in Fourier analysis,” *Archive
for History of Exact Sciences*, **21**,
(1979), 129-160.) See also the entries in
*Encyclopedia
of Mathematics* and *MathWorld*. [John Aldrich]

**GÖDEL’S INCOMPLETENESS THEOREM** refers to a result obtained by
Kurt Gödel
in his "Über formal unentscheidbare
Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme" (On
the formally undecidable theorems of Principia Mathematica and related systems),
*Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik*, **38**, (1931),
173-198.

The term *Gödel’s theorem* was used by Max Black in 1933
in *The Nature of Mathematics* (OED2).

The term *Gödel’s incompleteness
theorem* appears in W. V. Quine, "Element and Number,"*
Journal of Symbolic Logic*, **6**, (1941), p. 140. (*JSTOR* search)

**GOLDBACH’S CONJECTURE.** The term comes from the name
Christian Goldbach
(1690-1764).

*Théorème de Goldbach*
is found in G. Eneström, "Sur un théorème de
Goldbach (Lettre à Boncompagni)," *Bonc. Bull.* (1886).

*Théorème de Goldbach* is found in G. Cantor,
*Vérification jusqu'à 1000 du théorème de
Goldbach,* Association Française pour l'Avancement des
Sciences, Congrès de Caen (1894).

*Goldbach’s theorem* is found in 1896 in M.-P. Stackel,
"Über Goldbach’s empirisches Theorem," *Gött.
Nachrichten,* 1896.

*Goldbach-Euler theorem* appears in the title of an article "On
the Goldbach-Euler theorem regarding prime numbers" by James Joseph
Sylvester, which appeared in *Nature* in 1896/7.

*Goldbach’s problem* is found in English in 1902 in Mary Winton
Newson’s translation of Hilbert’s 1900 address in the *Bulletin of
the American Mathematical Society.*

*Goldbach’s theorem* occurs in English in the *Century
Dictionary* (1889-1897).

*Goldbach’s hypothesis* is found in J. G. van der Corput, "Sur
l'hypothese de Goldbach pour presque tous les nombres pairs" *Acta
Arith.* 2, 266-290 (1937).

*Goldbach’s conjecture* is found in 1919 in Dickson: "No
complete proof has been found for Goldbach’s conjecture in 1742 that
every even integer is a sum of two primes."

*Goldbach’s conjecture* appears in the title of the novel
*Uncle Petros and Goldbach’s Conjecture* by Apostolos Doxiadis,
published on March 20, 2000, by Faber and Faber.

**GOLDEN SECTION.** According to *Greek Mathematical Works I -
Thales to Euclid,* “This ratio is never called the Golden Section
in Greek mathematics.”

Euclid used the phrase *akron kai meson logon,* or
“extreme and mean ratio” in English. It is defined in *Elements,* Book VI, definition 3
(although the “extreme and mean ratio” appears implicitly already in Book II, prop. 11).
[Dr. Michael N. Fried]

Leonardo da Vinci used *sectio aurea* (the golden section),
according to H. V. Baravalle in "The geometry of the pentagon and the golden
section," *Mathematics Teacher,* 41, 22-31 (1948).

The OED2 has: "This celebrated proportion has been known since the 4th century b.c., and occurs in Euclid (ii. 11, vi. 30). Of the several names it has received, golden section (or its equivalent in other languages) is now the usual one, but it seems not to have been used before the 19th century."

*Goldenen Schnitt* appears in print for the first time in 1835
in the second edition of *Die reine Elementar-Mathematik* by Martin Ohm:

Diese Zertheilung einer beliebigen LinieIn the earlier 1826 edition, the term does not occur, but insteadrin 2 solche Theile, nennt man wohl auch den goldenen Schnitt.

Roger Herz-Fischler in *A Mathematical
History of Division in Extreme and Mean Ratio* (Wilfred Laurier
University Press, 1987, reprinted as *A Mathematical History of the
Golden Number,* Dover, 1998) concludes "that Ohm was not making up the name
on the spot and that it had gained at least some, and perhaps a great
deal of currency, by 1835" [Underwood Dudley].

The term appears in 1844 in J. Helmes in *Arch. Math. und
Physik* IV. 15 in the heading "Eine..Auflösung der sectio
aurea."

The term appears in 1849 in *Der allgemeine goldene Schnitt und
sein Zusammenhang mit der harmonischen Teilung* by A. Wigand.

According to David Fowler, it was the publications of Adolf Zeising’s
*Neue Lehre von den Proportionen des menschlischen Körpers*
(1854), *Äesthetische Forschungen* (1855), and *Der
goldne Schnitt* (1884) that did the most to widely popularize the
name.

*Golden section* is found in English in 1872 in
*The science of aesthetics; or, The nature, kinds, laws, and
uses of beauty* by Henry Noble Day:
"The rule of the 'golden section' has been one of the fruits
of these researches. This principle is the same as the
geometrical section into extreme and mean ratio. A line is
said to be so cut when the square on the larger of the two
parts is equal to the rectangle of the whole line and the
less part; or when the whole bears the same ratio to the
greater part that this part bears to the less" [University of Michigan Digital Library].

*Golden mean* appears in English in 1917 in *On Growth and
Form* by Sir D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson (1860-1948): "This
celebrated series, which..is closely connected with the *Sectio
aurea* or Golden Mean, is commonly called the Fibonacci series"
(OED2).

The term **GOODNESS OF FIT** is found in the sentence,
"The 'percentage error' in ordinate is, of course, only a rough test of
the goodness of fit, but I have used it in default of a better." This citation
is a footnote (p. 352) in Karl Pearson’s
"Contributions
to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution. II. Skew Variation in Homogeneous Material",
*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London* (1895) Series
A, **186**, 343-414. In 1900 Pearson introduced chi as a measure of goodness
of fit. [James A. Landau]

See CHI SQUARE.

**GOOGOL** and **GOOGOLPLEX** are found in Edward
Kasner, "New Names in Mathematics," *Scripta Mathematica.* 5:
5-14, January 1938 (unseen).

*Googol* and *googolplex* appear on Jan. 31, 1938, in the
"Science Today" column in the *Dunkirk (N. Y.) Evening Observer.* The
article mentions the "amusing article in *Scripta Mathematica."*

*Googol* and *googolplex* are found in March 1938 in *The
Mathematics Teacher*: "The following examples are of mathematical
terms coined by Prof. Kasner himself: turbine, polygenic functions,
parhexagon, hyper-radical or ultra-radical, googol and googolplex. A
googol is defined as 10^{100}. A googolplex is
10^{googol}, which is 10^{10100}." [This
quotation is part of a review of the January 1938 article above.]

*Googol* and *googolplex* were coined by the nine-year-old
nephew of American mathematician Edward Kasner (1878-1955), according
to *Mathematics and the Imagination* (1940) by Kasner and James
R. Newman:

Words of wisdom are spoken by children at least as often as by scientists. The name "googol" was invented by a child (Dr. Kasner’s nine-year-old nephew) who was asked to think up a name for a very big number, namely, 1 with a hundred zeros after it. He was very certain that this number was not infinite, and therefore equally certain that it had to have a name. At the same time that he suggested "googol" he gave a name for a still larger number: "Googolplex." A googolplex is much larger than a googol, but is still finite, as the inventor of the name was quick to point out. It was first suggested that a googolplex should be 1, followed by writing zeros until you got tired. This is a description of what would happen if one actually tried to write a googolplex, but different people get tired at different times and it would never do to have Carnera a better mathematician than Dr. Einstein, simply because he had more endurance. The googolplex then, is a specific number, with so many zeros after the 1 that the number of zeros is a googol. A googolplex is much bigger than a googol, much bigger than a googol times a googol. A googol times a googol would be 1 with 200 zeros, whereas a googolplex is 1 with a googol of zeros. You will get some idea of the size of this very large but finite number from the fact that there would not be enough room to write it, if you went to the farthest star, touring all the nebulae and putting down zeros every inch of the way.

The Merriam Webster dictionaries identify the nine-year-old nephew as Milton Sirotta, "b. about 1929." The Social Security death index shows one person named Milton Sirotta. He was born on Mar. 8, 1911, and died in Feb. 1981, with his last residence in Mount Vernon, N. Y.

In a 2004 article in the *Wall Street Journal* Carl Bialik wrote:

The date for that naming is widely given on Internet encyclopedias and in recent press coverage as the late 1930s, but Dr. Kasner’s living relatives say it happened closer to 1920. Milton turned nine in that year, and family archives show Dr. Kasner began referring to the number in lectures soon afterwards. ... But Denise Sirotta says her father, Edwin, told her "he was asked for a word with a sound that had a lot of O’s in it" — just as googol had many zeros. Ms. Sirotta, 55 years old, adds that, according to her father, “They both came up with it. It’s a sore point in my life that Milton gets the credit and my father doesn't get the credit.”

Ivan Panchenko provided the above quotation and writes:

This fits to the birth dates of Milton and Edwin Sirotta as given by the Social Security Death Index (March 8, 1911 and July 11, 1915, respectively; last residence of both: NY). My interpretation is that the SSDI dates are accurate (and actually belong to Kasner’s nephews) while the traditional dates (about or exactly 1938 as the year of coinage, about or exactly 1929 as the year of Milton’s birth) are based on the year of publication ofNew Names in Mathematics(1938) and the age of the nephew at the time of coinage as given inMathematics and the Imagination(9 years; subtract 9 from 1938). The 1938 article states: “I was walking in the woods with my nephew one day, and I asked the boy to think up any name for the number, any amusing name that entered his head.” It was “one day” and not necessarily in the same year. It is debatable whether it was really Milton in 1920/1921 or Edwin in 1924/1925 that Kasner was referring to. It would be clear if we knew that Kasner used the word in a lecture before 1924, but Bialik is not precise (“soon afterwards”) about that matter.

Merriam-Webster dictionaries pronounce googol with a secondary stress on the second syllable. Thus it is pronounced differently from the name of the Internet company Google, although that name has its origins in a misspelling of googol. See the account by David Koller.

**GRAD, GRADE, GRADIAN.** *Grad* or *grade* originally meant one ninetieth of a right
angle, but the term is now used primarily to refer to one hundredth
of a right angle.

*Gradus* is a Latin word equivalent to "degree."

Nicole Oresme called the difference between two successive
*latitudines* a *gradus* (Smith vol. 2, page 319).

The OED2 shows a use of *grade* in English in about 1511,
referring to one-ninetieth of a right angle.

The OED2 shows a use of *grade,* meaning one-hundredth of a
right angle, in 1801 in Dupré *Neolog. Fr. Dict.* 127:
"*Grade* .. the grade, or decimal degree of the meridian."

The term may have been used in the modern sense in the unpublished
French *Cadastre* tables of 1801.

In 1857, *Mathematical Dictionary and Cyclopedia of Mathematical
Science* has: "The French have proposed to divide the right angle
into 100 equal parts, called *grades,* but the suggestion has
not been extensively adopted."

In 1987 *Mathographics* by Robert Dixon has: “360° = 400 gradians = 2π radians.”

The calculator that is part of Microsoft Windows 98, in the scientific view, allows the user to choose between degrees, radians, and (erroneously) gradients.

The Texas Instruments TI-89 Titanium calculator has three modes,
*radians, degrees,* and *gradians.*

**GRADIENT** was introduced by Horace Lamb (1849-1934) in *An Elementary Course
of Infinitesimal Calculus* (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1897):

It is convenient to have a name for the property of a curve which is measured by the derived function. We shall use the term "gradient" in this sense. (OED)

*Gradient* in the **vector analysis** sense of the vector of partial derivatives
of a function of several variables did not become current until the early 20^{th}
century. It appears in H. Weber’s *Die partiellen differential-gleichungen
der mathematischen physik nach Riemanns Vorlesungen* of 1900.) The OED’s
earliest quotation with *gradient* is from J. G. Coffin’s *Vector Analysis*
(1909).

There were several earlier terms going back several decades.
J. C. Maxwell originally used the term *slope*, e.g. in his 1873
*Treatise
on Electricity and Magnetism*,
p. 15, but in the second edition he changed this to *space-variation*.
J. W. Gibbs favoured *derivative*, writing in his 1881 *Elements of Vector
Analysis Arranged for the Use of Students in Physics*, "if *u*
is any scalar function of position in space
*u* may be called the derivative of *u*..."
This term also appears in E. B. Wilson’s *Vector Analysis: A Text Book for the Use of Students of Mathematics
and Physics Founded upon the Lectures of J. Willard Gibbs* of (1901, p. 138),
although Wilson notes that the term *gradient* has been used as well. The
gradient and the symbol grad receive more attention in Wilson’s
*Advanced
Calculus* (1912, p. 172).

Sylvester used the term in a different sense in 1887 (OED2).

The *DSB* says that Maxwell introduced the term in 1870; this
seems to be incorrect.

[This entry was contributed by John Aldrich.]

**GRADUATION.** "The actuarial profession
has for decades, indeed centuries, used age related tables, particularly
(although not exclusively) of mortality, which in preparation have been
subjected to the process known as graduation." These are the opening words of a
1985 review "Criteria
of Smoothness" by H. A. R. Barnett, *Journal of the Institute of Actuaries*, **112**, 331.

"Graduation, or the Smoothing of Data" is the title of
ch. XI of E. T. Whittaker & G. Robinson’s
well-known treatise of 1924, *The Calculus of
Observations: A Treatise on Numerical Mathematics*. In it they
discuss a number of "formulae of graduation" devised by actuaries for smoothing LIFE
TABLES. Their oldest method is due to S. B. Woolhouse (1870) "Explanation of a New Method of adjusting Mortality
Tables" *Journal of the Institute of Actuaries*, **15**, 389. Some
of the methods they describe amount to the application of the METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES.

See SMOOTHING.

**GRAHAM’S NUMBER** is named for Ronald Graham.

The term "Graham-Spencer number" appears in
N. D. Nenov and N. G. Khadzhiivanov, "On the Graham-Spencer number,"
*C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci.* 32 (1979).

The term "Graham’s number" appears the 1985 *Guinness Book of World
Records,* and it may appear in earlier editions of that book.

The number is discussed in M. Gardner, "Mathematical Games," *Sci.
Amer.* 237, Nov. 1977.

**GRAM-SCHMIDT ORTHOGONALIZATION.** When Erhard
Schmidt presented the formulae on p. 442 of his “Zur Theorie der
linearen und nichtlinearen Integralgleichungen. I. Teil: Entwicklung
willkürlicher Funktionen nach Systemen vorgeschriebener,”
*Math. Ann.,* **63** (1907), 433-476 he said that essentially the same
formulae were in J.
P. Gram’s “Ueber die Entwickelung reeler Funtionen in Reihen mittelst
der Methode der kleinsten Quadrate,” *Jrnl.
für die reine und angewandte Math.* (1883), **94**, 71-73. Modern
writers, however, distinguish the two procedures, sometimes using the term
“Gram-Schmidt” for the Schmidt form and “modified
Gram-Schmidt” for the Gram version. R. W. Farebrother *Linear Least Squares Computations* (1988)
gives this information and proposes that the Gram form be re-named
“Laplace’s method” as it was already given in the First Supplement
(1816) of Laplace’s *Théorie Analytique des Probabilités*,
p. 497ff.

A *JSTOR* search found "Gram-Schmidt’s orthogonalization
process" in Y. K. Wong "An Application of Orthogonalization Process to the Theory
of Least Squares," *Annals of Mathematical Statistics*, **6**, (1935), 53-75.

**GRAPH (of a function).** The phrase *graph of a function* was used by Chrystal in 1886 in *Algebra*
I. 307: "This curve we may call the graph of the function" (OED2).

**GRAPH (verb)** is found in 1898 in Perry, *Applied
Mechanics* 21: "Students will do well to graph on squared paper some
curves like the following" (OED2).

**GRAPH** and **GRAPH THEORY.**
On April 27, 1961, the *Humboldt Standard* has: “For the Friday
assembly, at 10 a.m. at Sequoia Theater, the professor will discuss
‘The Graph Theory as a Model in the Social Sciences.’”

On June 5, 1963, the *Appleton Post-Crescent* has: “The potential uses of
graph theory in anthropology include subjects such as kinship and descent,
social structure and organization, geographical proximity and communication,
economic reciprocity and others.”

*Graph Theory 1736-1936* (1976) by N. L. Biggs, E. K. Lloyd and R. J. Wilson
begins with Euler’s KÖNIGSBERG BRIDGE PROBLEM and ends with
König’s graph theory of 1936. Among the contributors in between was
Hamilton; for the terms associated with him see HAMILTON.

Regarding the term *graph*, Biggs, Lloyd & Wilson
(p. 65) write that James Joseph Sylvester "conceived the notion that there
is a relationship between chemistry and algebra, exemplified by the use of graphic
notation. He published a note on his ideas in February 1878, in the scientific
journal *Nature*. In this note the word 'graph' is used in our sense for
the first time; it is clearly derived from the chemical graphic notation'."
In that note "Chemistry and Algebra", Sylvester wrote: "Every
invariant and covariant thus becomes expressible by a graph precisely identical
with a Kekulean diagram or chemicograph"
*Coll.
Math. Papers III pp. 103-4*.

Martin Gardner wrote in *Scientific American* in April 1964, "In the 1930s, the German [sic]
mathematician Dénes König made the first systematic study of all such patterns,
giving them the generic name 'graphs.'" [König was actually Hungarian.]
D. König
(1884-1944) published *Theorie
der endlichen und unendlichen Graphen* in Leipzig in 1936. Biggs, Lloyd and
Wilson (p. 206) reflect, "The year 1936 marked the two-hundredth anniversary
of Euler’s article on the problem of the Königsberg bridges, and so it was a
fitting coincidence that the first book on graph theory should be published
in that year."

**Graph theory** appears in English
in W. T. Tutte, "A ring in graph theory," *Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.*
43, 26-40 (1947).

Len Smiley, Adalbert Kerber, and John Aldrich contributed to this entry.

**GREAT CIRCLE** is found in English in 1594 in the title, *The
Sea-mans Secrets .. wherein is taught the 3 kindes of Sailing,
Horizontall, Paradoxall, and Sayling vpon a great Circle,* by John
Davis. Davis wrote, "Navigation consiseth of three parts, ... The
third is a great Circle Navigation, which teacheth bow upon a great
Circle, drawn between any two places assigned (being the only
shortest way between place and place) the Ship may be conducted and
to performed by the skilful application of Horizontal and Paraboral
Navigation."

**GREATEST COMMON DIVISOR** in Latin books was usually written as
*maximus communis divisor.*

Cataneo in 1546 used *il maggior commune ripiego* in Italian.

*Greatest common measure* is found in English in 1570 in
Billingsley, *Elem. Geom.*: "It is required of these three
magnitudes to finde out the greatest common measure" (OED2).

Cataldi in 1606 wrote *massima comune misura* in Italian.

*Highest common divisor* is found in 1830 in *A Treatise on Algebra*
by George Peacock. [Google print search]

*Highest common factor* is found in 1843 in *The Penny Cyclopædia of
the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge.*
[Google print search]

*Greatest common divisor* is found in English in 1811 in *An
Elementary Investigation in the Theory of Numbers* [James A.
Landau].

Olaus Henrici (1840-1918), in a Presidential address to the London Mathematical Society in 1883, said, "Then there are processes, like the finding of the G. C. M., which most boys never have any opportunity of using, except perhaps in the examination room."

**GREEN’S FUNCTION.** *Greensche Function* appears in 1861 in a paper by Carl Neumann
in *Crelle’s Journal 59,* 335.

The term *Green’s function* is also used in statistical physics.
In this sense the term was probably first used in 1850 by the Rev. Samuel
Haughton
in a note "On the function peculiar to a System of attracting and
repelling Molecules" in the *Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.* [Jan Peter Schäfermeyer]

**GREEN’S THEOREM** was so named by William Thomson (Lord Kelvin). In his
"On Peristaltic Induction of Electric Currents,"
*Proceedings
of the Royal Society, 8, (1856 - 1857)*, p. 124 Thomson relates how
he found the result and published it before learning that it was in
George Green’s (1793-1841)

The theorem bears the name of Mikhail Ostrogradski in Russia.

**GREGORY’S SERIES** is
the name mathematicians writing in English generally use for the Maclaurin
series for arc tan. The series was obtained by
James
Gregory in 1671 but the series—especially the case *x* = 1 when the series is for π/4—is
also associated with
Leibniz,
who obtained it in 1674. However the result had been obtained around three
hundred years earlier by the Indian mathematician
Madhava.
Western mathematicians only learnt of Madhava’s contribution in the twentieth
century. For details see Katz section 12.3 “Power Series.”

The term *Gregory’s series* is well
entrenched in the English literature. *Mr. Gregory’s
series* appears in 1714 in the famous adjudication of the priority
claims of Newton and Leibniz regarding the invention of the calculus,
“An Account of the Book entitled Commercium Epistolicum Collinsii et aliorum, De
Analysi promota; Published by order of the Royal-Society,
in relation to the Dispute between Mr. Leibnitz and Dr. Keill, about the Right
of Invention of the Method of Fluxions, by some call'd the Differential Method”
*Philosophical Transactions* 1714, pp. 173-224. This
unsigned document was written by Newton himself.

The term *Leibniz series* has always
been more common in Continental Europe. The combinations *Gregory-Leibniz* and *Leibniz-Gregory*
are also used. The use of *Madhava* seems to be confined to historical works such as R. C. Gupta,
“The Madhava-Gregory series,” *Math.
Education* 7 (1973), B67-B70 [James A. Landau].

See SERIES.

**GREGORY-NEWTON INTERPOLATION FORMULA.** The formula was first given in 1670 by
James
Gregory but Gregory did not publish it.
Isaac
Newton, working independently, published it in 1687 in his *Principia*. In 1924 E. T. Whittaker &
G. Robinson wrote in their *Calculus of
Observations* (p. 12), “The formula (1) is often referred to as *Newton’s
formula of interpolation,* although it was discovered by James
Gregory in 1670.” They referred instead to the “Gregory-Newton formula” and
their practice has been widely followed.

(See Erik Meijering A Chronology of
Interpolation: From Ancient Astronomy to Modern Signal and Image Processing *Proceedings of the IEEE*,
**90**, (2002), p. 322.)

See INTERPOLATION.

**GRELLING-NELSON PARADOX.** See the AUTOLOGICAL and HETEROLOGICAL.

**GROEBNER BASES.** Bruno Buchberger introduced Groebner bases in 1965 and named them
for W. Gröbner (1899-1980), his thesis adviser, according to *Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms* by Cox,
Little, and O’Shea [Paul Pollack]. See the entry in
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics.*

**GROUP** and **GROUP THEORY.**
Evariste
Galois introduced the term *group* in the form of the expression *groupe de
l’équation* in his “Mémoire
sur les conditions de résolubilité des équations par radicaux” (written in 1830
but first published in 1846)
*Oeuvres
mathématiques*. p. 417. Cajori (vol. 2,
page 83) points out that the modern definition of a group is somewhat different
from that of Galois, for whom the term denoted a subgroup of the group of
permutations of the roots of a given polynomial.

*Group* appears in
English in Arthur Cayley, “On the theory of groups, as depending on the
symbolic equation θ* ^{n}* = 1,"

Klein and Lie use the term “closed system” in their “Ueber diejenigen ebenen Curven,
welche durch ein geschlossenes System von einfach unendlich vielen
vertauschbaren linearen Transformationen in sich übergehen,”
*Mathematische
Annalen*, 4, (1871), 50-84. Klein adopted the term *gruppe* in his
“ Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen” written
in 1872 and reissued in
*Mathematische Annalen*,
43, (1893),63-100.
See the entry ERLANGEN PROGRAM.

The first book in English on the theory of groups was Burnside’s influential *Theory of groups of finite order*
published in 1897. The expression *group
theory* is found in English in 1898 in *Proc. Calf. Acad. Science* (*OED*).

See MacTutor
The
development of group theory and
Group in the *Encyclopaedia of Mathematics*.

**GRUNDLAGENKRISIS** (foundational crisis). Walter Felscher writes, "As far as I am
aware, 'Grundlagenkrisis' was a term invented during the Hilbert-Weyl discussion
between 1919 and 1922, occurring e.g. in Weyl’s "Über die neue Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik",
*Math.Z*.
10 (1921) 39-79."

The term **GUDERMANNIAN** was introduced by Arthur Cayley (1821-1895), according to Chrystal in *Algebra,* vol. II.
The term appears in an 1862 article by Cayley in the *Philosophical Magazine*
[*Collected
Mathematical Papers vol. 5* p. 86]. The term is named for
Christoph Gudermann. See
MathWorld.

**GYROID,** as the name of a minimal surface, was coined by Alan H. Schoen. (The discovery of this
intriguing surface is also due to him: “Infinite Periodic Minimal Surfaces
Without Selfintersections.” NASA Tech. Note No. D-5541. Washington, DC, 1970.)

On October 31, 2000 Schoen wrote (private correspondence):

My records don't show exactly when I thought of the name "gyroid", but I do find in my files a copy of a letter to Bob Osserman on March 3, 1969 in which I wrote as follows:The gyroid. This is my latest choice of a name for this surface, which is the only surface associate to the two intersection-free adjoint Schwarz surfaces ("P" and "D") that is free of self-intersections. (When Bob wrote back shortly afterward, he mentioned that he approved of the name. I suppose it was at least in part my having studied Latin and Greek in highschool and college that impelled me to search for a classical-sounding name for this surface. As soon as I stumbled on a name that shared its 'oid' ending with the helicoid and catenoid, I decided to look no further!Webster’s 3d International Dictionarydefines gyroidal as "spiral or gyratory in arrangement -- used esp. of the planes of crystals".)

This entry was contributed by Carlos César de Araújo. See MathWorld.