**N-GON** is found in 1867-78 in J. Wolstenholme, *Math.
Probl.* (ed. 2): "In the moving circle is described a regular
m-gon. .. The same epicycloid may also be generated by the corners
of a regular n-gon" [OED].

**N-VARIATE** is found in J. W. Mauchly, "Significance test for
sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution," *Ann. Math.
Statist.* 1 (1940).

See BIVARIATE, MULTIVARIATE, TRIVARIATE and UNIVARIATE.

**NABLA** (as a name for the Hamiltonian operator ,
also called DEL).
William Robertson Smith (1846-1894) suggested the name to P. G. Tait.
*Webster’s Third New International Dictionary* defines *nabla* as "an
ancient stringed instrument probably like a Hebrew harp of 10 or 12 strings...."

Tait used the symbol
for "the very singular operator devised by Hamilton" in *An Elementary Treatise
on Quaternions* (1867, p. 221). Tait made very effective use of the operator
in a series of papers, including "On Green’s and other allied theorems" (1870)
*Scientific Papers I,* p. 136.
The story of its naming is related in Cargill Gilston Knott’s
*Life and Scientific Work of Peter Guthrie Tait* (1911):

From the resemblance of this inverted delta to an Assyrian harp Robertson Smith suggested the name Nabla. The name was used in playful intercourse between Tait and Clerk Maxwell, who in a letter of uncertain date finished a brief sketch of a particular problem in orthogonal surfaces by the remark "It is neater and perhaps wiser to compose a nablody on this theme which is well suited for this species of composition." [...]It was probably this reluctance on the part of Maxwell to use the term Nabla in serious writings which prevented Tait from introducing the word earlier than he did. The one published use of the word by Maxwell is in the title to his humorous Tyndallic Ode, which is dedicated to the "Chief Musician upon Nabla," that is, Tait.

In a letter from Maxwell to Tait on Nov. 7, 1870, Maxwell wrote, "What do you call this? Atled?"

In a letter from Maxwell to Tait on Jan. 23, 1871, Maxwell began with, "Still harping on that Nabla?"

Maxwell and
Tait
were school friends and the background to the fun was Maxwell’s search for a suitable term to use in his own work.
In the event Maxwell called the operator
the *slope*: see
*A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism*
(1873, pp.15-16.) In "*On the importance of quaternions in physics"* (1890)
*Scientific Papers II,* pp. 303-4
Tait wrote "we must have a name attached to [this remarkable operator] and I shall speak of it as *Nabla*."

Heaviside also used "nabla" but without enthusiasm, "The fictitious vector
... is *very* important. Physical mathematics is very largely the mathematics
of
.
The name Nabla seems, therefore, ludicrously inefficient." ("On the Forces, Stresses, and Fluxes
of Energy in the Electromagnetic Field,"
*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. A*, **183**,
(1892), p. 431.)

See DEL, VECTOR ANALYSIS and the Earliest Uses of Symbols of Calculus page.

**NAPIERIAN LOGARITHM.** The term, which honors John
Napier, refers to the natural logarithm, although Napier did not strictly use this type of logarithm.

*Phil. Trans.* (1750) 46, 562 has:
"The Logarithms to that Spiral which cuts its Rays at Angles
of 45Degrees, are of the Napierian Kind" [Alan Hughes,
Associate Editor of the OED].

*Napers logarithm* is found in 1706 in *Synopsis Palmariorum Matheseos: Or, a New Introduction to the Mathematics Containing the Principles of Arithmetic & Geometry Demonstarted, In a Short and Easie Method.* [Google print search, James A. Landau]

*Napierian* appears in *Traité
élémentaire de calcul différentiel et de calcul
intégral* (1797-1800) by Lacroix: "Le nombre *e* se
présente souvent dans les recherches analytiques; on le prend
pour base d'un système logarithmique, que j'ai appelé
*Népérien,* du nom de Néper, inventeur des
logarithmes."

*Napierian* appears in English in 1816 in a
translation of *Lacroix’s Differential and Integral Calculus*:
"A system of logarithms, which we shall call Naperian, from the name
of Naper their inventor" [OED].

**NAPIER’s CONSTANT or NUMBER** is a rarely used name for the number generally denoted by *e*;
see the Earliest Uses of Symbols for Constants. The author of the *Encyclopedia of Mathematics*
entry believes the term has *no*
justification but the *MacTutor* entry on
John
Napier supplies a hint of one.

Surprisingly a *JSTOR* search found only *one* use of Napier’s constant,
viz. in Steven F. Maier, David W. Peterson, James H.
Vander Weide, “A Monte Carlo Investigation of Characteristics of Optimal
Geometric Mean Portfolios,” *The Journal
of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,* **12,** No. 2, June 1977. The term
*Napier’s constant* was used twice in an episode of the
television series *The X-Files* titled “Paper Clip,” which originally aired on Sept. 29, 1995.

**NASH EQUILIBRIUM,** a solution concept in non-cooperative game theory, was introduced by
John Nash
in his PhD dissertation and published in two papers, "Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games,"
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, **36**, (1950),
48-49 and "Non-Cooperative Games," *Annals of Mathematics*, **54**,
(1951), 286-295. The concept is generally referred to by his name, see e.g.
I. L. Glicksberg "A Further Generalization of the Kakutani Fixed Point Theorem,
with Application to Nash Equilibrium Points,"** ***Proceedings of the American
Mathematical Society*, **3**, (1952), 170-174. Nash received the 1994
Nobel Prize in Economic Science for this contribution to game theory.

See THEORY OF GAMES.

**NATURAL LOGARITHM (early sense).** According ti the DSB, Thomas
Fantet de Lagny (1660-1734) "attempted to establish trigonometric
tables through the use of transcription into binary arithmetic, which
he termed 'natural logarithm' and the properties of which he
discovered independently of Leibniz."

**NATURAL LOGARITHM (modern sense).** Boyer (page 430) implies
that Pietro Mengoli (1625-1686) coined the term: “Mercator took
over from Mengoli the name ‘natural logarithm’ for values
that are derived by means of this series.”

Joseph Ehrenfried Hofmann, in *Classical Mathematics: A Concise
History of Mathematics in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries*
(1959), writes, “Mercator, himself, took over Mengoli’s
designation of ‘natural logarithms’ ... ”

*Natural logarithm* is found (in Latin) in 1659 in Mengoli’s
*Geometriae speciosae Elementa*.
[Siegmund Probst]

Siegmund Probst writes that the term *logarithmus naturalis*
apparently does *not* appear in Mercator’s
*Logarithmo-technia sive methodus construendi logarithmos nova, accurata, &
facilis* in 1668.

Mercator *does* use the term *natural logarithm* (in Latin) in 1668 in
Some
Illustration Of the Logarithmotechnia, in *Philosophical Transactions,* volume 3, No. 38, August 17/27 1668, 759-764.
[Siegmund Probst]

Merriam-Webster dates the term in English to 1746.

In 1748 Euler called these logarithms “natural or hyperbolic” in his
*Introductio,* according to Dunham (page 26), who provides a
reference to Vol. I, page 97, of the *Introductio.*

**NATURAL NUMBER.** Chuquet (1484) used the term *progression
naturelle* for the sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.

In 1727, Bernard le Bouyer de Fontenelle (1657-1757) wrote in
*Elemens de la Geometrie de l'infini*:
"Pour mieux concevoir l'Infini, je considere la suite naturelle des
nombres, dont l'origine est 0 ou 1" [Gunnar Berg].

*Natural number* appears in 1763 in *The method of
increments* by William Emerson: "To find the product of all
natural numbers from 1 to 100" [OED].

*Natural number,* defined as the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.,
appears in the 1771 *Encyclopaedia Britannica* in the
*Logarithm* article.

In 1889, *Elements of Algebra* by G. A. Wentworth has: "The
*natural* series of numbers begins with 0; each succeeding
number is obtained by adding one to the preceding number, and the
series is infinite."

Apparently, except for the various *Random House* dictionaries,
all modern dictionaries define the term *natural number* to
exclude 0. [The term *whole number* is defined to include 0.]

Gerald A. Edgar wrote in sci.math that he has found that algebra texts tend to include 0 and analysis texts tend to exclude it.

Bertrand Russell in his 1919 *Introduction to Mathematical
Philosophy* writes:

To the average educated person of the present day, the obvious starting-point of mathematics would be the series of whole numbers,1, 2, 3, 4, . . . etc.

Probably only a person with some mathematical knowledge would think of beginning with 0 instead of with 1, but we will presume this degree of knowledge; we will take as our starting-point the series:

0, 1, 2, 3, . . . n, n + 1, . . .

and it is this series that we shall mean when we speak of the "series of natural numbers."

John Conway writes:

The older nomenclature was that "natural number" meant "positive integer." This was unfortunate, because the set of non-negative integers is really much more "natural" in the sense that it has simpler properties. So starting in about the 1960s lots of people (including me) started to use "natural number" in the inclusive sense. After all, for the positive integers we have the much better term "positive integer."Stephen Cole Kleene (1909-1994), in his Mathematical logic (John Wiley & Sons, 1967) wrote (p. 176):

Some authors use "natural numbers" as a synonym for "positive integers" 1, 2, 3, ..., obliging one to use the more cumbersome name "nonnegative integers" for 0, 1, 2, .... Besides, in this age, we should accept 0 on the same footing with 1, 2, 3, ... .[Carlos César de Araújo, Sam Kutler]

**NAUGHT or NOUGHT.** See ZERO.

**NEGATIVE.** According to Burton (page 245), Brahmagupta
introduced negative numbers and a word equivalent to *negative.*

In his *Ars Magna* (1545) Cardano referred to negative numbers
as *numeri ficti.* In speaking of the roots of an equation, he
wrote, "una semper est rei uera aestimatio, altera ei aequalis,
ficta" (Smith vol. 2, page 260).

Stifel (1544) called negative numbers *numeri absurdi.* He spoke of zero as
"quod mediat inter numeros veros et numeros absurdos" (Smith vol. 2,
page 260).

The word *negative* was used by Scheubel (1551) (Smith vol. 2,
page 260).

Robert Recorde in *Whetstone of Witt* (1557) used *absurde
nomber*: "8 - 12 is an Absurde nomber. For it betokeneth lesse
then nought by 4" [OED].

Napier (c. 1600) used the adjective *defectivi* to designate
negative numbers (Smith vol. 2, page 260).

*Negative* was used in English in 1673 by John Kersey in
*Elements of Algebra*: "A negative Root (which Cartesius calls a false Root)
expresseth a Quantity whose Denomination is opposite to an
affirmative, as -5 or -20" [OED].

**NEGATIVE BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION** appears in
Major Greenwood and G. Udny Yule’s "An Inquiry into the Nature of Frequency Distributions
Representative of Multiple Happenings with Particular Reference to the Occurrence
of Multiple Attacks of Disease or of Repeated Accidents," *Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society*, Vol. 83, No. 2. (Mar., 1920), pp. 255-279. [David
(1995)].

**NEIGHBORHOOD OF A POINT.** In an 1877 paper in the *Messenger of Mathematics,*
Arthur Cayley wrote, "The lines in the neighbourhood of a point
of maximum, or of minimum, parameter are ovals surrounding the point
in question, each oval being itself surrounded by the consecutive oval" [University
of Michigan Historical Math Collection].

*Neighborhood of a point* appears in 1891 in George
L. Cathcart’s translation of *An Introduction to the Study of the
Elements of the Differential and Integral Calculus* by Axel
Harnack:

With the foregoing considerations we have attained the conception of the Region or Neighbourhood of a point. By it we mean an arbitrarily small but still always finite interval at both sides of the valuex.

The epicycloid with two cusps (the dotted curve of fig. 39, which, from its shape, we may call theThis citation was provided by Julio González Cabillón. According to E. W. Lockwood, in 1879 Freeth used the same name for another curve, Freeth’s Nephroid.nephroid) presents also many interesting relations.

The term **NET** was coined by J. Kelley. He had considered using
the term "way" so the analog of subsequence would be "subway."
E. J. McShane also proposed the term "stream" since he thought it
was intuitive to think of the relation of the directed set as "being
downstream from" (McShane, *Partial Orderings and Moore-Smith
Limits,* 1950, p. 282).

**NEW MATH.** *New mathematics* is found in *Time*
magazine of Feb. 3, 1958, in the heading, "The new mathematics"
[OED].

*New math* is found in an article which appeared in numerous newspapers on Sept. 25, 1960:
“But the ‘new math’ is being promoted energetically by such influential bodies
as the U. S. Office of Education, the National Science Foundation, the National Education Association,
the Mathematical Association of America, the College Entrance Examination Board and the Carnegie Corporation.”

**NEWTON’S METHOD** and the **NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD.** By 1669
Isaac
Newton had devised a method for approximating the roots of equations. The
method circulated among his friends and is first referred to in print in the *Algebra* (1685) of John Wallis:
“Another Method of Approximation, by Mr. Isaac Newton.” In 1695 Wallis used the phrase
“Mr. Newton’s Method of Approximation for the Extracting of Roots” in “A Discourse
concerning the Methods of Approximation in the Extraction of Surd Roots,” *Phil. Trans.* **19**, p. 2.
(The quotations are from the *OED*).

In 1695 Wallis also referred to a modification of Newton’s method given by
Joseph
Raphson in his *Analysis aequationum
universalis* (1690). This eventually became the preferred method:
Lagrange described it as “plus simple que celle de Newton.” However Raphson’s modification
came to be called “Newton’s method.” The origins of the methods were examined
by the historian Florian Cajori, most thoroughly in his “Historical note on the
Newton-Raphson method of approximation,” *American
Mathematical Monthly*, **18**,
(1911), 29-32. Cajori (p. 31) concluded that “the
‘Newton-Raphson method’ would be a designation more nearly
representing the facts of history than is ‘Newton’s
method.’” Cajori’s term is now widely used although
the older term, “Newton’s method,” survives.

**NEXT TO CONVEX.** In a post to the geometry forum, Michael E.
Gage wrote that he believed the term was coined by Gromov in
"Hyberbolic manifolds, groups and actions," *Annals of Mathematics
Studies,* v. 97, page 183.

**NEYMAN ALLOCATION.** This method for allocating sample numbers to different strata was
proposed by Jerzy
Neyman, "On the two different aspects of the representative method;
the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection,"
*J. R. Statist. Soc.*, **97**, (1934), 558-625. The term "Neyman
allocation" seems to have come into use in the 1950s. See e.g. W. Edwards
Deming *Journal of the American Statistical Association*, **51**, (1956),
p. 31. (*JSTOR* search.) The method was proposed earlier by
Aleksandr
Aleksandrovich Chuprov (1874-1926) in "On the mathematical expectation
of the moments of frequency distributions in the case of correlated observations,"
*Metron*, **2**, (1923), 461-493, 646-683.

See STRATIFIED SAMPLING.

**NEYMAN-PEARSON (FUNDAMENTAL) LEMMA.** When
J. Neyman and
E. S. Pearson
first described the construction
of a best critical region they did not dignify the inequality they obtained
with a title (Section III of
"On
the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical
Hypotheses," *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
of London,* *Ser. A* (1933), **231**, 289-337.) The custom of calling
it a "lemma" seems to have been established by Neyman; see his "Tests
of Statistical Hypotheses Which are Unbiased in the Limit," *Annals of
Mathematical Statistics*, **9**, (1938), 69-86. The phrase "Neyman-Pearson
lemma" appears in P. L. Hsu "On the Power Functions of the E^{2}-Test
and the T^{2}-Test," *Annals of Mathematical Statistics*,
**16**, (1945), pp. 278-286 and the "Neyman-Pearson fundamental
lemma" in E. L. Lehmann’s "On Optimum Tests of Composite Hypotheses
with One Constraint," *Annals of Mathematical Statistics*, **18,**
(1947), p. 487 [John Aldrich].

See the entry on *Hypothesis* *and hypothesis testing*.

**NILPOTENT.** See *idempotent.*

The term **NINE-POINT CIRCLE** first appears in 1820 in
"Recherches sur la détermination d'une hyperbola
équilatére, au moyen de quatres conditions
données" by Charles-Julien Brianchon (1783-1864) and Poncelet
(DSB).

*Nine-points circle* appears in English in 1865 in Brande &
Cox, *Dict. Sci., etc.,* which has: "The circle which passes
through the middle points of the sides of a triangle is referred to
by Continental writers as 'the nine-points circle' [OED].

*Nine-point circle* appears in W. F. Mc Michael, "Elementary
proof of the contact of the nine-point circle with the inscribed and
escribed circles," *Mess.* (1881).

*Nine-point circle* also appears in English in C. Pendlebury,
"Proof of a nine-point circle theorem," *Ed. Times* (1881).

In *Plane Geometry* (1904), James Sturgeon Mackay wrote, "The
designation often given to the circle, namely, Euler’s circle, is
quite erroneous" [Ken Pledger].

According to Eves (page 437), the circle is sometimes called
*Euler’s circle* because of misplaced credit, and in Germany the
circle is called *Feuerbach’s circle.*

**NODE.** In 1753 Daniel Bernoulli used the Latin word
*noeud* [James A. Landau].

**NOETHERIAN RING** (named for
Emmy Noether)
is defined in Claude Chevalley “On the Theory of Local Rings,” *Annals of Mathematics*, **44**, (1943), 690-708.
(*JSTOR* search)

**NOETHER’S THEOREM** (named for
Max Noether).
*Noether’s fundamental theorem* is
found in English in H. J. Baker, "On Noether’s fundamental theorem,"
*Math. Ann.* (1893).

*Noether’s theorem* is found in English in F. S. Macaulay, "The
theorem of residuation, Noether’s theorem, and the Riemann-Roch
theorem," *Lond. M. S. Proc.* (1899).

**NOME.** The OED2 indicates this word comes to English from the
French *nôme,* the second element in *binôme*
(binomial).

In 1665 Collins used the term in English in correspondence: "The limits of such equations as have but two nomes."

In 1704 Harris’s *Lexicon technicum* has: "*Nome,* in
Algebra, is any Quantity with a Sign prefixed to it, and by which
'tis usually connected with some other Quantity, and then the whole
is called a *Binomial,* a *Trinomial,* &c."

About 1727 *nome* appears in English meaning "one of the 36
territorial divisions of ancient Egypt." Most recent dictionaries
indicate the word is derived from the Greek *nomos* meaning "a
pasture or district"; however, the OED2 indicates the word is derived
a Greek word meaning "to divide."

According to a post by Eric Conrad to the history of mathematics
mailing list, "the term *nome* for the argument *q* in
elliptic function theory comes from a Greek word meaning to partition
or divide. Many identities in elliptic function theory have
combinatorial interpretations involving partitions. For example, the
Fourier expansion of the elliptic function dn leads to an identity
which counts partitions of an integer into a sum of four squares."

The term **NOMOGRAPHY** is due to Philbert Maurice d'Ocagne
(1862-1938). It occurs in his *Traité de nomographie*
(1899) (DSB).

**NONAGON** is dated 1639 in MWCD10.

In 1688, R. Holme, *Armoury* has: "An Henneagon, or Enneagon or
Nonagon, a fort of nyne corners" [OED].

The 1828 *Webster* dictionary defines *nonagon* and
*enneagon.*

**NON-CANTORIAN** appears in Paul J. Cohen and Reuben Hersh,
"Non-Cantorian Set Theory," *Scientific American,* December
1967.

The term also appears in 1967 in the article "Set Theory" in *The
Encyclopedia of Philosophy* [James A. Landau].

The term **NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY** was introduced by Carl
Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) (Sommerville). Gauss had earlier used the
terms *anti-Euclidean geometry* and *astral geometry*
(Kline, page 872).

*Non-Euclidean geometry* is found in 1868 in the title of the paper
"Saggio di interpretazione della geometria non-euclidea" by Eugenio Beltrami.

*Non-Euclidean geometry* is found in English in 1872 in A. Cayley
"On the Non-Euclidian Geometry", *Mathematische
Ann.* vol. 5. p. 630: "The theory of Non-Euclidean Geometry as developed
in Dr. Klein’s paper 'Uber die Nicht-Euclidische Geometrie' may be illustrated
by showing how in such a system we actually measure a distance and an angle"
[David B. Shirt, Senior Science Editor, OED].

**NONINFORMATIVE (or UNINFORMATIVE) PRIOR.** These
terms entered circulation in the 1960s. A *JSTOR* search found an earliest
appearance of *noninformative* in G. E. P. Box & George C. Tiao
"A Bayesian Approach to the Importance of Assumptions Applied to the
Comparison of Variances," *Biometrika*, **51**, (1964), 153-167. Box and
Tiao were referring to Jeffreys’s invariant prior.

See JEFFREYS PRIOR.

**NON-NORMAL** appears in 1929 in *Biometrika* in the
heading: "On the distribution of the ratio of mean to standard
deviation in small samples from non-normal universes" [OED].

**NONPARAMETRIC** (referring to a statistical inference) is found in 1942 in
Jacob Wolfowitz (1910-1981),
"Additive Partition Functions and a Class of Statistical Hypotheses,"
*Annals of Mathematical Statistics,* 13, 247-279 "We shall refer to this situation
[where the knowledge of the parameters, finite in number, would completely determine
the distributions involved] as the parametric case, and denote the opposite
case, where the functional forms of the distributions are unknown, as the non-parametric
case." p. 264. (OED, David, 1995)

**NON-STANDARD ANALYSIS** was introduced by
Abraham Robinson
in a 1961 paper "Non-standard Analysis," *Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Amsterdam Series
A*, **64**, 432-440. "It is our main purpose to show that these [non-standard
models of the real number system] provide a natural approach to the age old
problem of producing a calculus involving infinitesimal (infinitely small) and
infinitely large quantities. As is well known, the use of infinitesimals, strongly
advocated by Leibnitz and unhesitatingly accepted by Euler fell into disrepute
after the advent of Cauchy’s methods which put Mathematical Analysis on a firm
foundation." (p. 433)

**NON-TERMINATING DECIMAL.** *Interminate decimal* is found
in 1714 in S. Cunn, *Treat. Fractions* Pref.: "The Reverend Mr.
Brown, in his System of Decimal arithmetick, manages such interminate
Decimals as have a single Digit continually repeated" [OED].

*Non-terminating decimal* is found in 1903 in *A College Algebra* by G. A. Wentworth:
"In the decimal scale of notation a common fraction in its lowest terms will produce
a non-terminating decimal if its denominator contains any prime factor except 2 and 5." [Google print search]

**NORM** and** NORMAL**. According to the *OED*, in Latin
*norma* could mean a square used by
carpenters, masons, etc., for obtaining right angles, a right angle or a standard
or pattern of practice or behaviour. These meanings are reflected in the mathematical
terms based on *norm* and *normal.*

**NORM** has at least three current meanings. The first two, from algebra and analysis, may apply to the same things,
which can be confusing.

**Norm** in **number theory** (and then algebra) comes from the term *norma* introduced
by Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) in 1832 in "Theoria residuorum biquadraticorum, Commentatio
secunda" *Commentationes Recentiones Soc. R. Scient. Gottingensis* VII. Class. math. 98
*Werke II*,
p. 132. Gauss was considering the complex integer (GAUSSIAN INTEGER)
*a* + *ib* and its *norma* referred to *a*^{2} +
*b*^{2}.

In 1856 W. R. Hamilton used *norm* to refer to *a*^{2}
+ *b*^{2} for any complex number *a* + *ib.* The *OED*
quotes from his *Notebook* in H. Halberstam & R. E. Ingram *Math.
Papers Sir W. R. Hamilton* (1967) III. 657, "*a* + *ib* is said
to be a complex number, when *a* and *b* are integers, and *i*
= ; its
norm is *a*^{2} + *b*^{2}; and therefore the norm of a product is equal to the product of the
norms of its factors."

In 1911-12 M. Bôcher & L. Brand used *norm* to refer to | *a*_{1}** ^{ }**|

In 1967 S. MacLane & G. Birkhoff *Algebra* v. 187,
"Each quadratic field Q(√ *d*),
with the elements σ = *r* + *s*√*d*,
has as automorphisms the identity and σ → = *r* - *s*√*d*.
The product σ = *r*^{2} + *s*^{2}*d* is called
the norm *N*(σ) of σ." (*OED*).

**Norm** in **analysis** is identified with distance
and a norm is required to satisfy the triangle inequality, which Gauss’s norma
does not.

In 1921 Albert A. Bennett "Normalized Geometric Systems,"
*Proc. National Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **7**
p. 84: "The notion of norm or numerical value of a complex quantity, *c*
= *a* + *b*√- 1, namely,
|*c*| = √(*a*^{2} + *b*^{2}), as it arises
in algebra, has a more or less immediate generalization to more extensive matric
systems." (*OED*)

In 1922 S. Banach defined “la norme” for an abstract linear space in
“Sur les
opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations
integrales”, *Fundamenta Mathematicae*, **3**, pp. 135-6.
Among the examples (pp. 167-8) is ║φ║
defined by

The **norm of a matrix**. In his *Theory of Matrices in Numerical
Analysis* (1964, p. 55) A. S. Householder writes, "The notion of
norms is fundamental in functional analysis, but until recently does not often
appear in the literature of numerical analysis or of the theory of matrices." Things
changed around 1940. For example, the term "norm" appears in Harold Hotelling
"Some New Methods in Matrix Calculation," *Annals of
Mathematical Statistics*, **14**, (1943), p. 11 and there is
a general discussion of norms in Albert H. Bowker "On the Norm of a Matrix,"
*Annals of Mathematical Statistics*, **18**, (1947), 285-288. The
norm used by Hotelling is the "absolute value of a matrix" described in
8.09 (p. 125)
of J. H. M. Wedderburn’s *Lectures on Matrices*
(1934). Wedderburn traces the idea back to Peano in 1887.

Another usage, unrelated to those given, is the **norm** of a partition of an interval used
e.g. in **Riemann integration**, to indicate
the fineness of the sub-division. The term is found in "On the Integration
of Discontinuous Functions" by Henry John Stephen Smith, which was read
before the London Mathematical Society on June 10, 1875: "We may term *d*
the *norm* of the division; it is evident that there is an infinite number of different
divisions having a given norm; and that a division appertaining to any given
norm, appertains also to every greater norm." [Google print search]

[The above was contributed by John Aldrich.]

**Norm of a vector.** On page 57 of his 1908 paper
“Über die Auflösung linearer Gleichungen
mit unendlich vielen Unbekannten,” *Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di
Palermo,* 25 (1908), Erhard Schmidt defines for a function A(x), x = 1, 2,
3 ..., which, he says in a footnote, can be regarded as a vector in an
infinite-dimensional space, a positive quantity ||A||, the Euclidean norm,
which he calls the length, and calls a vector “normirt,” if its length is
equal to 1. [Jan Peter Schäfermeyer]

The **NORMAL** distribution has been studied under various
names for nearly 300 years. Some names were derived from ERROR, e.g. the law
of error, the law of facility of errors and the law of frequency of errors.
Some were derived from persons associated with the distribution, e.g. Laplace’s
second law and the GAUSSIAN law. Stigler remarks in his "Stigler’s law of eponymy"
(see EPONYMY) that as the
distribution has *never* been called after Abraham De Moivre, who worked
on it in 1733, we may conclude that *he* was its originator. (See also
Symbols Associated with the Normal Distribution on the
Symbols in Probability and Statistics page.)

According to Kruskal & Stigler, the term *normal* was used, apparently
independently, by Charles S. Peirce (1873) in an appendix to a report of the
US Coast Survey (reprinted in Stigler (1980, vol. 2), Wilhelm Lexis *Theorie
der Massenerscheinungen in der menschlichen Gesellschaft *(1877) and Francis
Galton
'Typical laws of heredity' (1877).

Of the three, Galton had most influence on the development of Statistics in
Britain and, through his ‘descendants’ Karl Pearson and R. A. Fisher, on Statistics
worldwide. In the 1877 article Galton used the phrase "deviated normally" only
once (p. 513)--his name for the distribution was "the law of deviation." However
in the 1880s he began using the term "normal" systematically: chapter 5 of his
*Natural Inheritance* (1889) is entitled
"Normal Variability" and Galton
refers to the "normal curve of distributions" or simply the "normal curve."
Galton does not explain why he uses the term "normal"
but the sense of conforming
to a norm ( = "A standard, model, pattern, type." (OED)) seems implied.

Karl Pearson wrote, in his
"Contributions
to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution," *Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society of London. A*, **185**, (1894) p. 72,
"A frequency-curve, which for practical purposes, can
be represented by the error curve, will for the remainder of this paper be termed
a normal curve." Later Pearson seemed to imply that *he* had introduced
the term: "Many years ago I called the Laplace-Gaussian curve the *normal* curve ..."
(*Biometrika*, **13**, (1920), p. 25). While Pearson did
*not* introduce the term, it is fair to say that his "consistent and exclusive
use of this term in his epoch-making publications led to its adoption throughout
the statistical community." (DSB) Curiously a main theme in Pearson’s scientific
work was that data did *not* ‘normally’ follow this distribution and that
alternative distributions had to be devised. (See the entry on Pearson curves.)

Once the basic normal terminology was adopted *NORMAL*
appeared in many expressions. These must have seemed more or less obvious
to their creators and were probably re-invented many times.

*Normal correlation* appears in W. F. Sheppard,
"On the
application of the theory of error to cases of
normal distribution and normal correlation," *Phil. Trans.
A,* **192**, (1899) page 101, and *Proc. Roy. Soc. 62,* page 170
(1898) [James A. Landau].

*Normal curve* appears in Galton’s Natural Inheritance (1889)--see above.

*Normal distribution* appears in Karl Pearson’s 1897
"Contributions
to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution. II. Skew Variation in Homogeneous Material,"
*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. A*, **186**,
(1895), pp. 343-414: "A random selection from a normal distribution"
[OED].

*Normal deviate* is found in 1925 in R. A. Fisher,
*Statistical Methods for Research Workers*
p. 47: "Table I. shows that the normal deviate falls outside the range
+/-1.598193 in 10 per cent of cases" [OED].

*Normal law* is found in Francis Galton’s
"Results
Derived from the Natality Table of Korosi by
Employing the Method of Contours or Isogens," *Proceedings of the
Royal Society*, **55**, (1894), p. 23 (JSTOR search).

*Normal population* appears in Karl Pearson’s
"Contributions
to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution," *Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society of London. A*, **185**. (1894), p. 104. [JSTOR search].

*Normal sample* is found in R. A. Fisher’s
The
Goodness of Fit of Regression Formulae and the Distribution
of Regression Coefficients.
*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society*, **85**, No. 4. (1922), p. 599 [JSTOR search]

*Normal universe* is found in W. A. Shewhart & F. W. Winters
"Small Samples--New Experimental Results" *Journal of the American Statistical
Association*, **23**, (Jun., 1928), p. 145. [JSTOR search].

*Normal variate* was in wide use in the 1930s and is found in Joseph Pepper’s
"Studies in the Theory
of Sampling," *Biometrika*, **21**, (1929), p. 239. [JSTOR search]

*Normality* appears in Karl Pearson
"Contributions
to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution. II. Skew Variation in Homogeneous Material,"
*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. A*, **186**,
(1895), p. 386. [JSTOR search]

This entry was contributed by John Aldrich drawing on Kruskal & Stigler "Normative Terminology" in Stigler (1999), Hald (1998, p. 356) and Walker (p. 185). See CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM, ERROR and GAUSSIAN.

The term **NORMAL EQUATION** in least squares was introduced
by Gauss in 1822 [James A. Landau]. Kruskal & Stigler‘s
"Normative Terminology" (in Stigler (1999)) consider various hypotheses about
where the term came from but do not find any very satisfactory.

**NORMAL MATRIX.** C. C. MacDuffee, *The Theory of Matrices,* Springer (1933, p. 76)
refers to O. Toeplitz, "Das algebraische Analogon zu einem Satze von Fejér,"
*Mathematische
Zeitschrift,* **2**, (1918), 187-197.

**NORMAL NUMBER.** The concept of a normal number was introduced by Émile Borel in
"Les probabilités dénombrables et leurs applications arithmétiques,"
*Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo*, 27 (1909), 247-271, reprinted in *Oeuvres* T.
II. Borel’s result that almost all numbers in [0,1] are normal was important in
both number theory and probability theory. For the former aspect see the
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics* entry
Normal number and, for the
latter, Section 3.3 of Vovk & Shafer "The Origins and Legacy of Kolmogorov’s *Grundbegriffe*,"
*Statistical Science*
(2006) Number 1 70-98. Borel’s result was the earliest version of the strong law of large
numbers.

See LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS.

**NORMAL SPACE** in topology. *Normale Räume* are
defined in P Alexandroff and P. Urysohn “Zur Théorie
der topologischen Räume,”
*Mathematische Annalen*, *92*, (1924),
258-266. In their *Topologie* Alexandroff and Hopf (1935, p.
68) also call them *T*_{4} spaces. A *JSTOR* search found the
English phrase in M. H. Stone’s “Boolean Algebras and their
Application to Topology,” *Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences* **20**, (1934), 197-202. See the *Encyclopedia of Mathematics*
entry.

See the entry *T*_{1} SPACE.

**NORMAL SUBGROUP.** According to Kramer (p. 388), Galois used the
adjective "invariant" referring to a normal subgroup.

According to *The Genesis of the Abstract Group Concept* (1984)
by Hans Wussing, "The German *Normalteiler* (normal subgroup)
goes back to Weber [H., *Lehrbuch der Algebra,* vol. 1,
Braunschweig, 1895. p.511] and is possibly linked to Dedekind’s term
*Teiler* (divisor), which was employed in ideal theory" [Dirk
Schlimm].

*Normal subgroup* is found in English in 1908 in *An
Introduction to the Theory of Groups of Finite Order* by Harold
Hilton: "Similarly, if every element of *G* transforms a
subgroup *H* into itself, *H* is called a *normal,
self-conjugate,* or *invariant* subgroup of *G* (or 'a
subgroup normal in *G*')."

G. A. Miller writes in *Historical Introduction to Mathematical
Literature* (1916), "In the newer subjects the tendency is
especially strong to use different terms for the same concept. For
instance, in the theory of groups the following seven terms have been
used by various writers to denote a single concept: invariant
subgroup, self-conjugate subgroup, normal divisor, monotypic
subgroup, proper divisor, distinguished subgroup, autojug."

**NORMALIZER** appears in German as *Normalisator* in
*Theorie der Gruppen von endlicher Ordnung,* 2nd ed., by A.
Speiser [Huw Davies].

**NTH** is found in 1756 in *Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London* 49/84:
“If the given series..be raised to the *n*^{th}
power, the terms of the series will truly exhibit all the different chances in all the proposed (n) observations.” [OED]

*Nth* is found in 1820 in *Functional Equations* by
Babbage: "To find periodic functions of the *n*th order...."

*Nth* is found in 1831 in *Elements of the Integral
Calculus* (1839) by J. R. Young:

In all the foregoing examples, the first differential coefficient is given to determine the primitive function from which it has been derived; when, however, it is not the first, but thenth differential coefficient which is given, then by a first integration, we shall arrive at the preceding orn- 1th differential coefficient; by a second integration we get then- 2th coefficient; and, by thus continuing the integration, we at length arrive at the original function.

[John Aldrich, based on David (2001)]

**NULL CLASS** is found in Bertrand Russell’s *Principles of Mathematics* (1903). G.
Peano’s "Dizionario di Matematica," *Revue de mathématiques*, **7**, (1900-1),
160-172 has an entry under *Nulla*: "La classe nulle, classe non contenente individui ..."

See NULL SET and EMPTY SET.

**NULL HYPOTHESIS.** See HYPOTHESIS and HYPOTHESIS TESTING.

**NULLITY** appears in 1884 in James Joseph Sylvester, "Lectures on the Principles of Universal Algebra," *Amer.
Jrnl. Math.* VI. (1883-4) 274
Coll Math Papers p. 211:

The absolute zero for matrices of any order is the matrix all of whose elements are zero. It possesses so far as regards multiplication .. the distinguishing property of the zero, viz. that when entering into composition with any other matrix .. the product .. is itself over again... This is the highest degree of nullity which any matrix can possess, and (regarded as an integer) will be called ω, the order of the matrix... In general.., if all the minors of order ω -i+ 1 vanish, but the minors of order ω -ido not all vanish, the nullity will be said to bei.

**NULL SPACE **appears in 1884 in Arthur Buccheim’s
"Proof of Professor Sylvester’s ‘Third law of motion,’" *Philosophical Magazine*,
**18**, 459-460. This "law of motion" for matrices states that "the nullity
of the product of two matrices is not less than the greater of their nullities,
but not greater than the sum of the two nullities."

Buccheim* *writes, "A linear space of (α-1) dimensions will be
called an α-point... A matrix A of order *n* is considered as operating
on the coordinates of the points of an *n*-point... If A is of nullity
α, the equation A(*x*_{1}...*x** _{n}*) = 0 is satisfied
by all the points of a certain α-point, and
conversely. I call this α-point the null space of A." (OED).

The word **NUMBER** entered English around 1300. The *OED* gives several quotations and traces the word to the Anglo-Norman
and to the Old French, and ultimately to the Latin *numerus.*

**NUMBER LINE.** An earlier term was *scale of numbers.*

*Number line* seems to appear in the June 1899 *Telephone Magazine*:
“Gauss’s representation of complex numbers is not systematic, on account of the
direct step from the number line to the num-...”
This use is found using Google books search, which only provides snippet views of this periodical;
thus the word “seems.”
[James A. Landau]

In 1912,

*Number Line* appears several times in
Herbert Ellsworth Slaught, "The evolution of
numbers — An historical drama in two acts,"
*American Mathematical Monthly* 35 #3 (March 1928),
146-154. [Dave L. Renfro, Pat Ballew]

Lawrence M. Henderson, "An Alternative Technique for Teaching
Subtraction of Signed Numbers," *The Mathematics Teacher,* Nov.
1945 has: "In teaching subtraction of signed numbers, I first draw a
number scale."

*Number line* is found in January 1956 in "An exploratory
approach to solving equations" by Max Beberman and Bruce E. Meserve
in *The Mathematics Teacher*: "In an earlier paper we described
a procedure by which students could ’solve' equations and
inequalities using a number line. The set of points on a number line
is in one-to-one correspondence with the set of real numbers."

**NUMBER THEORY.** According to Diogenes Laertius,
Xenocrates
of Chalcedon wrote a book titled *The theory of numbers.* However, the most
famous classical work on number theory was the *Arithmetika* of Diophantus. See the entry ARITHMETIC.

A letter written by Blaise Pascal to Fermat dated July 29, 1654, includes the sentence, "The Chevalier de Mèré said to me that he found a falsehood in the theory of numbers for the following reason."

The term appears in 1798 in the title *Essai sur la théorie
des nombres* by Adrien-Marie Legendre (1752-1833).

*Zahlentheorie* appears in 1802 in *Geschichte der griechischen Astronomie bis auf Eratosthenes*
by Johann Konrad Schaubach.

In English, *theory of numbers* appears in 1811 in the title
*An elementary investigation of the theory of numbers* by Peter
Barlow.

*Number theory* appears in 1853 in *Manual of Greek literature
from the earliest authentic periods to the close of the Byzantine era*
by Charles Anthon:
"The ethics of the Pythagoreans consisted more in ascetic practice and in
maxims for the restraint of the passions, especially of anger, and the
cultivation of the power of endurance, than in scientific theory. What
of the latter they had was, as might be expected, intimately connected
with their number-theory" [University of Michigan Digital Library].

*Number theory* appears in 1864 in *A history of philosophy
in epitome* by Dr. Albert Schwegler, translated from
the original German by Julius H. Seelye:
"Not only the old Pythagoreans, who have spoken of him, delighted in
the mysterious and esoteric, but even his new-Platonistic biographers,
Porphyry and Jamblichus, have treated his life as a historico-philosophical romance.
We have the same uncertainty in reference to his doctrines, i. e. in reference
to his share in the number-theory. Aristotle, e. g. does not ascribe this
to Pythagoras himself, but only to the Pythagoreans generally, i. e. to their school"
[University of Michigan Digital Library].

*Number theory* appears in 1912 in the *Bulletin of the
American Mathematical Society* [OED].

The words **NUMERATOR** and **DENOMINATOR** are found
in 1202 in *Liber abbaci* by Leonardo of Pisa:

Cum super quemlibet numerum quedam uirgula protracta fuerit, et super ipsam quilibet alius numerus descriptus fuerit, superior numerus partem uel partes inferioris numeri affirmat; nam inferior denominatus, et superior denominans appellatur. Vt si super binarium protracta fuerit uirgula, et super ipsam unitas descripta sit ipsa unitas unam partem de duabus partibus unius integri affirmat, hoc est medietatem sic 1/2 [When above any number a line is drawn, and above that is written any other number, the superior number stands for the part or parts of the inferior number; the inferior is called the denominator, the superior the numerator. Thus, if above the two a line is drawn, and above that unity is written, this unity stands for one part of two parts of an integer, i. e., for a half, thus 1/2].

**NUMERICAL ANALYSIS.** Although the name *numerical analysis* is fairly new, the concerns
of the subject go back centuries. Thus H. H. Goldstine’s *A History of Numerical Analysis from the 16 ^{th}
through the 19^{th} Century* (1977) begins with the invention of
LOGARITHMS.

*Numerical analysis* is found in 1730 in *The Present State of the Republick of Letters. For March 1730.*
This is a review of *Mathematique Universelle* by P. Castell:
“The numerical Analysis (or the small Analysis, as ’tis sometimes term’d) composes the second part of this *Algebra,*
and is perhaps a treatise of as great variety, and made here as amusing and entertaining to read, as *Algebra* has been generally
deem’d dry and difficult. The Author has added to it several curious arts, that depend upon *Algebra.*
And first we find the analysis of Numbers, their generation, their properties, their magick, and all the
other pretended mysteries.” [Google print search, James A. Landau]

Lagrange wrote a paper “Essai d'analyse
numérique sur la transformation des fractions,” which appeared in 1799 in *Journal
De l’ecole Polytechnique, Vol. II*. An English translation of this paper
appeared in Thomas Leybourn, ed *The Mathematical Repository, New Series
Volume I* (1806) under the title “An Essay of Numerical Analysis, on the
Transformation of Fractions.”

The phrase *numerical analysis* was used intermittently
in the 19^{th} century but it only became the generally accepted name
for the subject some decades into the 20^{th} century.

*Numerical analysis* appears in 1853 in *A dictionary of science, literature & art*
in a discussion of the rule of false position: "The rules given for the
solution of questions in double position, are founded on certain principles
of algebra, which may be applied with much greater facility to the immediate
solution of the questions themselves. Such questions, therefore, cannot be considered
as properly belong to arithmetic, but to what may be denominated numerical analysis"
[University of Michigan Digital Library].

It appears in S. Réalis, "Questions d'analyse numérique,"
*N. C. M. V.* (1879).

In German the term *numerisches Rechnen* became standard: see
e.g. the 1902 article by R. Mehmke in the *Encyklopädie*
Band I Teil II p. 941 and the 1924 book *Vorlesungen über numerisches
Rechnen* by C. Runge and H. König. Meanwhile in English there was still no
standard term. E. T. Whittaker & G. Robinson’s well-known book of
1924 is called *The Calculus of Observations: A Treatise on Numerical Mathematics*.

*Numerical mathematical analysis* occurs in 1930 in the title *Numerical Mathematical Analysis*
by J. B. Scarborough. "The object of this book is to set forth in a systematic
manner ... the most important principles, methods and processes used for obtaining
numerical results; and also methods and means for estimating the accuracy of
such results." (Preface) (OED)

The form *numerical analysis* re-appears in the 1940s.
See Randolph Church, "Numerical analysis of certain free distributive structures,"
*Duke Math. J.* 6 (1940) and from 1946 *Ann. Computation Lab. Harvard Univ.* **1** 338
(*heading*) Bibliography of numerical analysis. (OED)

In the 1950s the term became established with the authors
of textbooks/treatises, e.g. from 1952, D. R. Hartree *Numerical Analysis.* (OED)

[John Aldrich, James A. Landau]

**NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION** is found in W. G. Bickley, "Formulae
for Numerical Differentiation," *Math. Gaz.* 25 (1941) [James A.
Landau].

**NUMERICAL INTEGRATION.** See the entry QUADRATURE.